EB-2 to EB-3: when the lower category is the shorter line
Choose your country of chargeability and enter your priority date to see which of the two lines is ahead for you in this month’s Visa Bulletin.
Checked by Radif Partners · Editorial policy · Method and past error
EB-2 or EB-3: which is ahead for my date?
Ahead this month
EB-3
| EB-2 | November 1, 2013 · 4 months behind |
| EB-3 | January 1, 2014 · 2 months behind |
Switching needs a new I-140 in EB-3; the priority date carries over once it is approved.
A downgrade from EB-2 to EB-3 means an employer files a second Form I-140 for the same worker in the third preference, so that the worker can use whichever line is moving faster. The USCIS Policy Manual lets the beneficiary of an approved petition keep its priority date on a later petition, so the EB-3 filing does not restart the wait. If an I-485 is already pending, the applicant can ask USCIS in writing to transfer it to the new petition; the decision is discretionary, a visa must be immediately available on the date of the request, and no new I-485 or filing fee is required. The comparison changes over time. In the 2026 bulletins, EB-3 India stands at January 1, 2014 against November 1, 2013 for EB-2 India, while for the rest of the world EB-2 is ahead. In the Octobers since 2016, EB-3 India led in 6 and EB-2 India in 4.
Why a lower category can be a shorter wait
EB-2 is the preference for advanced degrees and exceptional ability, EB-3 the one for skilled workers and professionals. The labels suggest a ranking, but each category has its own share of the yearly employment numbers and its own queue of applicants from each country. When more people born in a country are waiting in EB-2 than in EB-3, the EB-3 cutoff can sit later than the EB-2 one. The so-called downgrade is a response to that: the worker who qualifies for EB-2 also qualifies for EB-3, and the employer files in the line that happens to move faster.
This month, side by side
The table reads the October 2026 bulletin for each chargeability column. A later date is a shorter wait for the same priority date.
| Chargeability | EB-2 Final Action | EB-3 Final Action | EB-2 Date for Filing | EB-3 Date for Filing | Ahead (Final Action) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All other countries | January 1, 2025 | May 15, 2024 | March 15, 2026 | August 1, 2024 | EB-2 |
| China (mainland born) | October 1, 2021 | January 8, 2022 | January 1, 2023 | April 1, 2024 | EB-3 |
| India | November 1, 2013 | January 1, 2014 | January 15, 2015 | January 15, 2015 | EB-3 |
| Mexico | January 1, 2025 | May 15, 2024 | March 15, 2026 | August 1, 2024 | EB-2 |
| Philippines | January 1, 2025 | August 15, 2023 | March 15, 2026 | January 1, 2024 | EB-2 |
For an Indian applicant, the EB-3 cutoff is later than the EB-2 one by about 2 months this month. For the rest of the world the order is reversed, and EB-2 leads by about 8 months, even after the 608-day retrogression of EB-2 for the rest of the world in the October issue. Mexico and the Philippines share the worldwide EB-2 date this month, while the Philippines has an EB-3 date of its own.
Every October since 2016
October is the first bulletin of each fiscal year, which makes it a fair point of comparison from one year to the next. The table puts the two categories next to each other for the columns where they differ most.
| October | Rest of world EB-2 | Rest of world EB-3 | China EB-2 | China EB-3 | India EB-2 | India EB-3 | Philippines EB-3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Current (C) | June 1, 2016 | February 15, 2012 | January 22, 2013 | January 15, 2007 | March 1, 2005 | December 1, 2010 |
| 2017 | Current (C) | Current (C) | May 22, 2013 | January 1, 2014 | September 15, 2008 | October 15, 2006 | December 1, 2015 |
| 2018 | Current (C) | Current (C) | April 1, 2015 | June 1, 2015 | March 26, 2009 | January 1, 2009 | June 1, 2017 |
| 2019 | Current (C) | Current (C) | January 1, 2015 | November 1, 2015 | May 12, 2009 | January 1, 2009 | October 15, 2017 |
| 2020 | Current (C) | Current (C) | March 1, 2016 | July 1, 2017 | September 1, 2009 | January 15, 2010 | Current (C) |
| 2021 | Current (C) | Current (C) | July 1, 2018 | January 8, 2019 | September 1, 2011 | January 1, 2014 | Current (C) |
| 2022 | Current (C) | Current (C) | June 8, 2019 | June 15, 2018 | April 1, 2012 | April 1, 2012 | Current (C) |
| 2023 | July 8, 2022 | December 1, 2021 | October 1, 2019 | January 1, 2020 | January 1, 2012 | May 1, 2012 | December 1, 2021 |
| 2024 | March 15, 2023 | November 15, 2022 | March 22, 2020 | April 1, 2020 | July 15, 2012 | November 1, 2012 | November 15, 2022 |
| 2025 | December 1, 2023 | April 1, 2023 | April 1, 2021 | March 1, 2021 | April 1, 2013 | August 22, 2013 | April 1, 2023 |
| 2026 | January 1, 2025 | May 15, 2024 | October 1, 2021 | January 8, 2022 | November 1, 2013 | January 1, 2014 | August 15, 2023 |
Read down the Indian columns and the lead changes hands: EB-3 India was ahead in 6 of these Octobers and EB-2 India in 4. Counting every monthly bulletin since October 2015, the Indian order flipped 8 times. The Chinese columns show the same instability, with EB-3 China ahead in 9 Octobers and EB-2 China in 2. For the rest of the world, both categories were current for years, then both acquired cutoffs, and the gap between them has stayed modest. A downgrade decided on one October’s numbers can look wrong a year later.
Not the same line as EB-3 Other Workers
The bulletin prints a separate row for EB-3 Other Workers, a subgroup inside the third preference with its own cutoff. The Visa Bulletin explains that no more than 10,000 of the third-preference numbers go to that subgroup, and its cutoff often trails the main EB-3 row: for the rest of the world it reads January 1, 2022 this month, against May 15, 2024 for skilled workers and professionals. A downgrade from EB-2 aims at the skilled-worker or professional row, the one that matches a job already offered at the advanced-degree level. Reading the wrong row is an easy mistake when comparing the two categories. More on EB-3 Other Workers.
How the switch works on paper
The mechanics rest on two USCIS rules. The first is priority date retention, set out in the Policy Manual chapter on employment-based evidence: once a petition is approved, the beneficiary keeps its priority date for later petitions, except after a revocation for fraud or willful misrepresentation, a revoked labor certification, or a material error. An EB-3 petition filed after an approved EB-2 petition therefore carries the older date.
The second is the transfer of underlying basis, which matters only when an I-485 is already pending. The applicant asks USCIS in writing to move the pending application to the new petition. The Policy Manual sets several conditions:
- the I-485 is still pending, since a request received on or after the final decision is denied;
- a visa is immediately available in the new category on the date the request is filed;
- the new petition is properly filed before the original one is withdrawn, denied or revoked, and approved first where the new basis requires it;
- the applicant shows eligibility in the new category, and no new ground of inadmissibility or bar appears.
USCIS treats simple transfers between the first three employment categories as a recognized case, but the decision stays discretionary. No new adjustment application and no new filing fee are required for the transfer itself.
The costs and the trade-offs
The second petition is a new I-140, so the employer pays the I-140 fee again: $715 on paper or $665 online in the G-1055 schedule, before any legal fees. A downgrade also commits the case to the EB-3 line, which can retrogress on its own schedule. If the EB-2 line overtakes again, a further transfer back is a new request, with the same conditions. Some applicants keep both petitions on file to preserve that choice; others prefer one clean case. The calculator above compares the two lines for your date this month, and the full calculator adds the history and our tested forecast range for each. Whether a second petition makes sense for a given job and employer is a question for an immigration attorney, not for a table.